Legislature(1993 - 1994)

1994-01-14 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

1994-01-14                     House Journal                      Page 2077
HJR 9                                                                        
HJR 9 was again before the House.                                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that                   
Amendment No. 1 be withdrawn.  There being no objection, it was so             
ordered.                                                                       
                                                                               
New Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representative Davies:                      
                                                                               
Page 1, line 4, after "state" (title amendment):                             
	Insert ", and prohibiting a change in the rate of a tax that is            
imposed on fisheries, motor fuels, tobacco, or alcohol that is in              
effect on January 1, 1995, without the approval of the voters of the           
state"                                                                        
                                                                               
Page 1, line 10, after "retail sales tax":                                 
	Insert "and a law changing the rate of a tax that is imposed on           
fisheries, motor fuels, tobacco, or alcohol that is in effect on               
January 1, 1995,"                                                          
                                                                               
Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that New               
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Objection was heard.                                                           
                                                                               

1994-01-14                     House Journal                      Page 2078
HJR 9                                                                        
The question being:  "Shall New Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The                
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
HJR 9                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
New Amendment No. 1                                                            
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  23   EXCUSED:  5   ABSENT:  0                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein,                  
Grussendorf, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Willis                       
                                                                               
Nays:  Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hoffman,                 
Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder,                   
Olberg, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey            
                                                                               
Excused:  Brice, Mackie, Parnell, Sitton, Williams                             
                                                                               
Ulmer changed from "Yea" to "Nay".                                             
                                                                               
And so, New Amendment No. 1 was not adopted.                                   
                                                                               
The Speaker ruled Amendment Nos. 2, 3 and 4 out of order, citing               
Mason's Manual, section 402.                                                   
                                                                               
Representative Navarre appealed the ruling of the Chair.                       
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall the ruling of the Chair be upheld?"  The           
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
Uphold Ruling of the Chair                                                     
                                                                               
YEAS:  21   NAYS:  14   EXCUSED:  5   ABSENT:  0                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James,           
Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Phillips,                
Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey                                     
                                                                               
Nays:  Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein,                  
Grussendorf, Hoffman, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Ulmer,              
Willis                                                                         

1994-01-14                     House Journal                      Page 2079
HJR 9                                                                        
Excused:  Brice, Mackie, Parnell, Sitton, Williams                             
                                                                               
And so, the ruling of the Chair was upheld.                                    
                                                                               
Amendment No. 5 was offered  by Davidson:                                       
                                                                               
Page 1, line 4, after "state" (title amendment):                             
                                                                               
Insert ", and prohibiting a change in the rate of a tax that is              
imposed on fisheries without the approval of the voters of the                 
tax."                                                                         
                                                                               
Representative Davidson moved and asked unanimous consent that                 
Amendment No. 5 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Phillips objected.                                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
Representative Davidson moved and asked unanimous consent that the             
following amendment to Amendment No. 5 be adopted.  There being                
no objection, it was so ordered.                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 5 as amended:                                                    
                                                                               
After "voters of the":                                                       
                                                                               
	Delete "tax"                                                                
                                                                               
	Insert "state"                                                              
                                                                               
Add:  Page 1, line 10, after ",":                                          
                                                                               
Insert "a fisheries tax,"                                                 
                                                                               
                                                                               
Representative Davidson moved and asked unanimous consent that                 
Amendment No. 5 as amended be adopted.                                         
                                                                               
Representative Phillips objected.                                              
                                                                               

1994-01-14                     House Journal                      Page 2080
HJR 9                                                                        
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 5 as amended be                      
adopted?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                       
                                                                               
HJR 9                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 5 as amended                                                     
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  22   EXCUSED:  5   ABSENT:  1                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein,                  
Grussendorf, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Ulmer, Willis                        
                                                                               
Nays:  Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hoffman,                 
Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder,                   
Olberg, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey                   
                                                                               
Excused:  Brice, Mackie, Parnell, Sitton, Williams                             
                                                                               
Absent:  Menard                                                                
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 5 as amended was not adopted.                            
                                                                               
The Speaker ruled Amendment No. 6 out of order.                                
                                                                               
Representative Ulmer appealed the ruling of the Chair.                         
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall the ruling of the Chair be upheld?"  The           
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
Uphold Ruling of the Chair                                                     
                                                                               
YEAS:  23   NAYS:  11   EXCUSED:  5   ABSENT:  1                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Barnes, Bunde, Carney, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley,                  
Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder,                   
Nicholia, Olberg, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey         
                                                                               
Nays:  Brown, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf,             
Hoffman, Navarre, Nordlund, Ulmer, Willis                                      
                                                                               
Excused:  Brice, Mackie, Parnell, Sitton, Williams                             

1994-01-14                     House Journal                      Page 2081
HJR 9                                                                        
Absent:  Menard                                                                
                                                                               
And so, the ruling of the Chair was upheld.                                    
                                                                               
Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that HJR
9 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on             
final passage.                                                                 
                                                                               
Representative Ulmer objected.                                                 
                                                                               
The Speaker stated that HJR 9 will be in third reading on the January          
18, 1994, calendar.